Size: a a a

WebAssembly — русскоговорящее сообщество

2019 May 13

P

Parra in WebAssembly — русскоговорящее сообщество
where MetaCall is able to break your monolith application into single functions that can be scaled horizontally in different "servers"
источник

P

Parra in WebAssembly — русскоговорящее сообщество
it's a new way of scalability
источник

P

Parra in WebAssembly — русскоговорящее сообщество
and it's possible without modifying your source or writting a single line of DevOps
источник

P

Parra in WebAssembly — русскоговорящее сообщество
I have articles if you want to read more about it
источник

ҪҸ

Ҫѐҏӗѫӑ Ҹҋ 🤖 in WebAssembly — русскоговорящее сообщество
Parra
I have articles if you want to read more about it
sure 👍
источник

AF

Alexey F. in WebAssembly — русскоговорящее сообщество
man, we are on the page. I’m thinking about these possibilities too. It has a lot of sense!
источник

P

Parra in WebAssembly — русскоговорящее сообщество
this is the landing page of the FaaS
источник

P

Parra in WebAssembly — русскоговорящее сообщество
источник

P

Parra in WebAssembly — русскоговорящее сообщество
источник

P

Parra in WebAssembly — русскоговорящее сообщество
and this the article
источник

P

Parra in WebAssembly — русскоговорящее сообщество
it's a bit outdated because it doesn't consider unikernels or micro-vms
источник

P

Parra in WebAssembly — русскоговорящее сообщество
Alexey F.
man, we are on the page. I’m thinking about these possibilities too. It has a lot of sense!
thanks mate, if you are interested on it we can do some PoC, or similar
источник

P

Parra in WebAssembly — русскоговорящее сообщество
using WASM can be interesting, allowing more programming languages and backends
источник

P

Parra in WebAssembly — русскоговорящее сообщество
I was planning to implement LLVM as a backend, but it's complex, takes time, and now WASM is the default backend of LLVM so.. it will be better to do WASM direcly
источник

P

Parra in WebAssembly — русскоговорящее сообщество
now I support ruby, python, js, nodejs, and netcore as backend and python and ruby as frontend
источник

P

Parra in WebAssembly — русскоговорящее сообщество
there are some benchmarks in the core, but also I have tested it against existing http servers, and this approach outperforms nodejs and python common http servers
источник

AF

Alexey F. in WebAssembly — русскоговорящее сообщество
Parra
thanks mate, if you are interested on it we can do some PoC, or similar
sure, this sounds great indeed. One thing which is not clear to me still: in the current FaaSs user able to use scripting languages, looks like these users are not too much interested in writing Rust or C++ for their purposes.. So it means it’s a slightly new market (somewhere in-between of FaaS and Docker, I guess..)
источник

P

Parra in WebAssembly — русскоговорящее сообщество
Alexey F.
sure, this sounds great indeed. One thing which is not clear to me still: in the current FaaSs user able to use scripting languages, looks like these users are not too much interested in writing Rust or C++ for their purposes.. So it means it’s a slightly new market (somewhere in-between of FaaS and Docker, I guess..)
do you mean that wasm wont be useful for FaaS because c/c++ isn't used for functions?
источник

AF

Alexey F. in WebAssembly — русскоговорящее сообщество
Parra
do you mean that wasm wont be useful for FaaS because c/c++ isn't used for functions?
I think it all makes sense. Users will have more options with Wasm
источник

P

Parra in WebAssembly — русскоговорящее сообщество
yeah, it's not common to write c/c++ and rust for functions
источник